Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore: P4ADEV-1277-postman-test-activity #99

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

chore: P4ADEV-1277-postman-test-activity #99

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

macacia
Copy link
Collaborator

@macacia macacia commented Oct 22, 2024

Description

List of Changes

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Pre-Deploy Test
    • Unit
    • Integration (Narrow)
  • Post-Deploy Test
    • Isolated Microservice
    • Broader Integration
    • Acceptance
    • Performance & Load

Types of changes

  • PATCH - Bug fix (backwards compatible bug fixes)
  • MINOR - New feature (add functionality in a backwards compatible manner)
  • MAJOR - Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@macacia macacia marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 13:26
@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
98.4% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@macacia macacia merged commit 21e3707 into develop Oct 22, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@macacia macacia deleted the P4ADEV-1277-postman-test-activity branch October 22, 2024 14:31
umbcoppolabottazzi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2024
@macacia @umbcoppolabottazzi
chore: P4ADEV-1277-postman-test-activity (#99)
1a8d8ba
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@antonioT90 antonioT90 antonioT90 approved these changes

@LarissaASLeite LarissaASLeite Awaiting requested review from LarissaASLeite LarissaASLeite is a code owner

@antocalo antocalo Awaiting requested review from antocalo antocalo is a code owner

@Benedetta-fabbri Benedetta-fabbri Awaiting requested review from Benedetta-fabbri Benedetta-fabbri is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@macacia @antonioT90